By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.
The Supreme Court's recent 6-3 decision in Snyder v. United States weakens the federal law available to federal prosecutors to fight state public corruption when federal funding is involved and has been criticized as broadly limiting federal oversight of state and local government based on the principle of federalism.
The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Snyder v. United States has introduced a potential loophole in federal corruption enforcement concerning local and state officials. This highlights the Court's tendency to create a favorable environment and strong protections for white-collar defendants, particularly in distinguishing between misconduct that is morally wrong versus criminally actionable.
California Civil Code Section 1951.2 defines the remedies available to a landlord in the event of a tenant’s breach and abandonment of the premises, but some landlords may want remedies beyond those described in 1951.2. California Civil Code Section 1951.4 is available if the lease clearly includes that remedy.